![]() |
Source Omega Chapel Hill, NC 27516 Phone: 919-360-5275 Email info@source-omega.com |
CUSTOMER FEEDBACK: a) J.B. said "I take Pure One every day. It has a mood effect. So I truly enjoying taking it", North Carolina 2009. b) G.D. reports "Pure One lowered my high triglycerides. I started at 304 mg/dL taking 4 per day. I dropped 10% in 3 months and 29% in 10 months on the tharapy. I was so happy I sent you my doctor's results." , Wisconsin 2009. c) P.K., customer from New York says "I'm diabetic so can't take fish oil at high levels, I discovered you because Pure One is diabetic-friendly. I take the DHA Therapy for my dyslipidemia, plus now I have a lower triglyceride score, thank you!", Brooklyn 2008. The complete contents of Heartwire, a professional news service of WebMD, can be found at www.theheart.org, a Web site for cardiovascular healthcare professionals. Summary: From European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2008 Congress*Information and statements regarding this supplement have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. From Heartwire — a professional news service of WebMD September 3, 2008 — Omega-3 fatty-acid supplementation improves morbidity and mortality in symptomatic heart-failure patients, while statins failed to have any beneficial effect in the same group of patients, two new studies have shown [1,2]. The long-term administration of omega-3 fatty acids reduced all-cause mortality and admission to the hospital for cardiovascular (CV) reasons, while there was no effect on these end points with 10-mg rosuvastatin (Crestor, AstraZeneca). The Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico Heart Failure (GISSI-HF) trial — which includes two nested studies designed to test the two hypotheses — was presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2008 Congress and published online in The Lancet. Speaking to the 9% reduction in all-cause mortality with omega-3 fatty acids in The Lancet, the GISSI-HF investigators write: "Although this moderate benefit was smaller than was expected, we should note that it was obtained in a population already treated with recommended therapies, was consistent across all the predefined subgroups, and was further supported by the findings of the per-protocol analysis." Chair of the GISSI-HF steering committee, Dr Luigi Tavazzi (Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy), who presented the omega-3 fatty-acid data to the media during an ESC press conference, said the treatment is an "effective, safe, simple, and cheap" option for patients with chronic heart failure. In an editorial accompanying the published studies [3], Dr Gregg Fonarow (University of California, Los Angeles) echoed the sentiment, writing that while "questions remain about the mechanism of action, optimum dosing, and formulation, supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids [PUFA] should join the short list of evidence-based life-prolonging therapies for heart failure." GISSI-HF, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and statins The GISSI-HF project is a large-scale, randomized, double-blind study designed to investigate the effects of omega-3 fatty acids and statin therapy on mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic heart failure. In the PUFA study, investigators enrolled patients with chronic heart failure — NYHA class 2 - 4 regardless of cause and left ventricular ejection fraction — and randomized them to treatment with n-3 PUFA 1 g daily or placebo. Patients were followed for nearly four years, with the co-primary end points being death and death or admission to the hospital for cardiovascular reasons. After 3.9 years of follow-up, treatment with the omega-3 fatty acids reduced the risk of mortality by 9% and mortality and admission to the hospital for cardiovascular causes by 8%. The absolute reduction in risk was small, just 1.8%, but investigators report that 56 patients would need to be treated to avoid one death and 44 patients would need to be treated to avoid one death or admission for cardiovascular reasons. A per-protocol analysis that included only patients who remained on treatment for the study duration confirmed the overall findings, showing that treatment cut the absolute risk by 3.3% compared with placebo, or a 14% relative risk reduction.
Study Highlights
Pearls for Practice